Re: Quenya Wikibook
From: | Jörg Rhiemeier <joerg_rhiemeier@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, February 27, 2007, 20:49 |
Hallo!
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:28:11 -0500, Mark J. Reed wrote:
> Guys, totally not the place for Tolklang infighting.
>
> Facts:
>
> 1. JRRT's langs were not in a complete - or, really, very usable -
> form at the time of his death.
>
> 2. Other people have since invested great effort to create usable
> languages based on them.
>
> We can probably all agree that #1 is a damn shame. Whether you're for
> or against #2 is pretty much irrelevant. If you would like to study
> the results of the efforts by Helge and Salo et al, great! Have fun!
> Discussion of those languages' grammar, translations into and out of
> them, etc. is of course wholly appropriate fodder for this mailing
> list.
>
> If you have no interest in those languages - whether due to general
> apathy toward Tolklangs or active antipathy reserved for the
> non-canonical heretical ones - that's fine, too. Just ignore any such
> messages.
>
> Either way I see no need to debate it in this forum.
100% agreed. Tolkien must be spinning in his grave over this bullshit.
I have always been of the opinion that his beautiful languages deserve
better than being the subject of the hatred and bigotry found in the
Tolkienian linguistics mailing lists.
... brought to you by the Weeping Elf