Re: Quenya Wikibook
| From: | andrew <hobbit@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Wednesday, February 28, 2007, 3:03 |
|---|
On Wednesday 28 February 2007 9:20 am, Jörg Rhiemeier wrote:
> Hallo!
>
> There is a similar controvery about the attempts at the revival of
> Cornish; the Cornish revivalists use similar methods as the
> reconstructionist Quendianists, and besides there being different
> reconstructions of Cornish ("Common Cornish", "Unified Cornish",
> "Unified Cornish Revised", etc.), there are scholars who say that
> revived Cornish is not true Cornish.
>
I was thinking of the same analogy myself. The next initiative should
be a Reformed Neo-Elvish that incorporates Hostetter's criticisms.
Where is Pannini when we need him?!
Of course way more fun is to biff Tolkien and invent your own language.
- andrew.