Re: Another Thing From Straight Dope
From: | Barry Garcia <barry_garcia@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, June 14, 2000, 22:41 |
CONLANG@LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU writes:
>I noticed two contained the syllable "taq", I wonder if that's a root,
>or mere co-incidence? But, other than that, they appear to be
>unrelated, at least at a glance. If they use any kind of ablaut, then
>there's several others that may be related, like _hiko_ and the _hiku-_
>of _hikuliaq_. Eight of the seventeen end in -aq, I wonder if that has
>a meaning, or just more co-incidence?
>
>But, of course, some of these words refer to _ice_, rather than _snow_.
>And is certainly a lot less than "hundreds", as has been claimed by
>some.
>
>And he goes on to say that they have "20 words for trout", without any
>examples. Hmm, is there gonna be a "Great Eskimo Trout Hoax", now, with
>people claiming hundreds of words? ;-)
You know, you can write to Cecil if you have info that may clarify or
dispute what he wrote in his columns. There's even an email, and a snail
mail address listed on the main site page you can write ;)
_________________________________________________________
This ain't a yes, this ain't a no, just do your thang, we'll see how it
goes