Quoting David Peterson <ThatBlueCat@...>:
> Andreas also wrote:
>
> <<
> There's, of course two further possibilites - "tripartite" languages that
> have
> separate markers for each of S, A and P, and "clairvoyant" languages, that
> treat them all the same, using only context to disambiguate A and P. <snip>
> >>
>
> Dude, don't I get *some* credit? Everything you
> mentioned in this e-mail is on the site.
I didn't actually _read_ your page, I'm afraid. I suppose I overinterpreted your
reference to MRL as "the" third possibility.
> One thing I'd like to ask (since I haven't looked
> up the loony thread) is if valency-reduction systems
> were every discussed with the loony system.
I don't believe they were.
Andreas