CONLANG@LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU writes:
>It gets posted on this list & others with irregular(but IMNSHO too
>frequent) monotony. Versions of it have been around since at least the
>1980s to my knowledge.
>
>What beats me is why it still has currency. It's not merely a spelling
>reform - it also includes important changes to English phonemic structure.
>Hardly likely, methinks.
Isnt it supposed to be funny, and not to be taken seriously? (Hence the
spelling changes as the article goes on) I thought it was funny when I
first read it and thought no way was it supposed to be real in any sense.