Re: Optimum number of symbols
From: | Nik Taylor <fortytwo@...> |
Date: | Monday, May 20, 2002, 0:22 |
Tim May wrote:
> There are cursive and semicursive styles of Chinese and Japanese
> calligraphy using logograms, too, although they seem rather hard to
> decipher.
I'm under the impression that most Chinese and Japanese people find them
illegible too. :-) In those cases, artistic considerations take
precedence of considerations of legibility.
Incidentally, the number characters in Uatakassi are derived from
cursive variants of an old logographic script. The language uses a base
12, but, confusingly, the written language uses base 6 for numbers under
144; higher characters were changed to fit base 12, so that the
character that originally referred to 216 (6^3) came to be reinterpreted
as 144.
The origins of the characters:
1: Finger
2: Sun (there are 2 suns on this planet)
3: Moon (there are 3 moons)
4: The two skies (i.e., sky in a generic; there are distinct terms for
day sky and night sky; the 3 moons and the lesser sun are
traditionally called the nomads, as they can exist in both day sky
and night sky)
5: Sun-and-moon
6: Hand
36: Person (six digits on both hands, both feet, and in both wings -
they have vestigial wings)
144: Village
The forms can be found at the bottom of the syllabry chart at
http://Nik_Taylor.tripod.com/Conlang/Syllabry.html
--
"There's no such thing as 'cool'. Everyone's just a big dork or nerd,
you just have to find people who are dorky the same way you are." -
overheard
ICQ: 18656696
AIM Screen-Name: NikTaylor42