Re: Optimum number of symbols
From: | Muke Tever <alrivera@...> |
Date: | Monday, May 20, 2002, 12:41 |
I wrote:
> Dlaitarte madii hautha phigla Teechthe.
>
> dX-lai_ta_rX-te.ma_dii.hau_tha.phi-gX_la.tee_chX-the
Oops...that's awful. Better:
da-lai ta ra-ta-e.ma da-ii.ha-au tha.pha-i gX la.ta-ee cha-tha-e
And since there is no <ai> (but there is an <au>) better to put it:
da-la-?i ta ra-ta-e
ma da-ii
ha-au tha
pha-i gX la
ta-ee cha-tha-e
AND, since a picture is worth a thousand words, I wrote it out.
(I don't know where the red notebook where the original notes are is... luckily
I had a copy of the abugida on the computer already.)
(16 KB) http://www.frath.net/images/henatext.gif
On the right is the IPA value for the signs on the left.
Yes the quality (of the whole production) is awful. I will do better Another
Time.
*Muke!
--
http://www.frath.net/