Re: Optimum number of symbols
From: | Nik Taylor <fortytwo@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, May 22, 2002, 4:45 |
"Thomas R. Wier" wrote:
> Not so strange. As I recall, *p lenited in initial position to
> contemporary /h/, whereas in morphological alternations, it became
> a /b/ after nasal codas (the unmarked condition).
Actually, it was /p/ -> /P/ in all contexts except geminated and
post-nasally, then [P] -> [h] except before /M/. Actually, /P/
sometimes became /w/ word-medially (later, /w/ was lost except before
/a/), I'm not sure exactly what determined when that happened, but verbs
with a final syllable of -u come from original -pu, which is why their
past tense is -tta (<-pita).
What I meant was, odd from a synchronic perspective.
--
"There's no such thing as 'cool'. Everyone's just a big dork or nerd,
you just have to find people who are dorky the same way you are." -
overheard
ICQ: 18656696
AIM Screen-Name: NikTaylor42