Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Declension Help

From:Roger Mills <rfmilly@...>
Date:Sunday, December 17, 2006, 18:14
Adam F. wrote:
> What is an allomorph? >
a. A _morpheme_ is a minimal unit of meaning, not further analyzable. b. An allomorph is a variant form of a morpheme, often required for phonological reasons, but not always. Exs.: Morpheme: all non-compound words; all grammatical affixes and particles. So "dog" is a morpheme, dog+plural is 2 morphemes, realized regularly as dog+s, prounounced [dOgz]. You could refer either (1) to the morpheme {plural} which in Engl. has 3 regular allomorphs ( [s, z, @z] ) determined by the phonetic environment (respectively, voiceless final stop, voiced final/vowel, preceding sibiliant/affricate), and several irregular allomorphs: -en in a few words (ox-, child-**), vowel change (man/men), i/ae/a in a few Latin loans, and zero (sheep) etc. -------------- **note that {child} has the allomorph {childr-} in the plural -------------- Or (2) you could refer to it as some abstract phonological unit, say {S} or {Z}, which then undergoes regular/irregular realizations. Note that Romance languages have compound morphemes, that include both number, and usually gender: Span. -o is singular/masculine, -a sing./feminine; there are also zero morphemes (I.e. those words that don't end in -o/a.) English has a few of these: I '1st pers.sing/nom.' me '1st/sing/acc, dat.', my '1st sing./poss. Latin combines _case_: -us is nom/masc/sing; -arum is gen/fem/pl. etc. Although I've used nouns as exs., Engl. and Romance verbs are notorious for haveing irregular allomorphs. This is somewhat oversimplified, but I hope you see what I mean. I'd imagine Wikipedia has a lot to say on the subject; also, try googling.

Reply

Philip Newton <philip.newton@...>