Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Branching typologies [was: Re: "easiest" languages, SE Asian word-order typologies]

From:Vasiliy Chernov <bc_@...>
Date:Thursday, September 27, 2001, 15:28
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001 14:42:35 -0500, Thomas R. Wier
<trwier@...> wrote:

>I'm curious: what is the most common branching typology for our >conlangs? Phaleran is very left-branching: SOV word order, relative >clauses before the noun they modify, adjectival particles before >the noun they modify. Degaspregos was/is more right branching: >although it has mainly SOV word order, relative clauses and >adjectives usually come after the modified noun.
I can say definitely that I've never designed a consequentially left-branching lang. At least dependent clauses always go to the right. While otherwise I tend to play with every new feature that I can grasp the idea of. Which perhaps means that my intuition fails to grasp something about left-branching syntax.
>You know what -- we should compile a brief synopsis of all types >of conlinguistic typologies. It would shed some light not so much >on language, but rather more likely, on the conlanger population.
I think this is a good idea. Basilius