Re: V2
From: | Thomas R. Wier <artabanos@...> |
Date: | Saturday, November 13, 1999, 23:34 |
Nik Taylor wrote:
> Dale Morris wrote:
> >
> > jmpearson@FACSTAFF.WISC.EDU writes:
> >
> > > To give some examples, if English were V2, then each of the following
> > > sentences would be grammatical (here square brackets are used to indicate
> > > constituents):
>
> Actually, there are a few vestiges of V2 in English, as in "Never have I
> heard such nonsense" (compare *"Never I have heard ..."), but, of
> course, this is only in a few cases.
It seems to be invoked for added emphasis in conjuction
with adverbials. Compare:
(a) I would have spoken to him then.
_Then_ I would have spoken to him.
Only _then_ would I have spoken to him.
*Only then I would have spoken to him
(b) I knew then that...
Only then did I know that...
*Only then I knew that...
(This last example from (b) would, though, be grammatical for
me in other contexts, with a concordant shift in meaning)
So, the adverbs seem to also trigger Do-support, as with
questions and negations.
======================================
Tom Wier <artabanos@...>
ICQ#: 4315704 AIM: Deuterotom
Website: <http://www.angelfire.com/tx/eclectorium/>
"Cogito ergo sum, sed credo ergo ero."
Non cuicumque datum est habere nasum.
It is not given to just anyone to have a nose.
-- Martial
======================================