Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: V2

From:Daniel Andreasson <noldo@...>
Date:Saturday, November 13, 1999, 18:36
Dale Morris skrev:

> Matt Pearson: > > [ John ] GAVE [ the book ] [ to Daniel ] [ yesterday ] > > [ the book ] GAVE [ John ] [ to Daniel ] [ yesterday ] > > [ to Daniel ] GAVE [ John ] [ the book ] [ yesterday ] > > [ yesterday ] GAVE [ John ] [ the book ] [ to Daniel ] > > > > In other words, V2 languages can be SVOX, OVSX, or XVSO.
> So in these languages can the subject and object only be =
determined by
> inflection and/or context? =20
[I know this has been replied to, but perhaps I can add something] As a native V2 speaker (Swedish), there is no case marking on the NP:s (only pronouns, and only animate pronouns; in fact 3pl is on its way of having no subj/obj distionction) and no marking of person on the verbs either. But 60% of the time the word order is SVO and thus a subject is first. 25% of the time an adverbal phrase is first and only around 15% of the sentences in everyday speech are object first. The normal way of knowing if the first word is subject or object is either context, prosody or=20 the fact that subjects often are animate and objects inanimate. In case of prosody, a sentence initial object is emphasized. Like: 'THE BOOK gave John to Daniel' (in fact, John didn't give me a book yesterday... ;)
> Or are certain of the above patterns used in > specific situations?
Only as a way of topicalize different constituents. / Daniel Andreasson