Re: Lingo

En réponse à Abrigon Gusiq <abrigon@...>:

> Yes, so? When I was on this list some years ago, I believe that was
> the
> "abbreviation" I used.. Just takes to many key strokes for me.
What? "lang" vs. "lingo"?!!! Are you mad are do you do that on purpose? How can
a four-letter word ask more key strokes than a five-letter one?

 And
> oddly
> people actually often know what I mean. So is it useful? After all the
> use of communication is to communicate? So how success am I in
> communicating my meaning?
>
Very unsuccessful. Your cryptic e-mails mostly take up bandwidth but don't seem
to give any meaning, and when they do they are obviously wrong. We have a 100-
mail limit on this list and we cannot afford this kind of behaviour. So if you
want to carry on posting to the list, at least use an understandable language
and check your facts before. If it means more keystrokes for you, too bad for
you. But we won't accept being the victims of your laziness.

Christophe.

http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr

Take your life as a movie: do not let anybody else play the leading role.

Reply