> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christophe Grandsire" <christophe.grandsire@...>
> To: <CONLANG@...>
> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 7:04 AM
> Subject: Re: Lingo
>
>
> > En réponse à Abrigon Gusiq <abrigon@...>:
> >
> > > Yes, so? When I was on this list some years ago, I believe that was
> > > the
> > > "abbreviation" I used.. Just takes to many key strokes for me.
> >
> > What? "lang" vs. "lingo"?!!! Are you mad are do you do that on purpose?
> How can
> > a four-letter word ask more key strokes than a five-letter one?
> >
> > And
> > > oddly
> > > people actually often know what I mean. So is it useful? After all the
> > > use of communication is to communicate? So how success am I in
> > > communicating my meaning?
> > >
> >
> > Very unsuccessful. Your cryptic e-mails mostly take up bandwidth but
don't
> seem
> > to give any meaning, and when they do they are obviously wrong. We have
a
> 100-
> > mail limit on this list and we cannot afford this kind of behaviour. So
if
> you
> > want to carry on posting to the list, at least use an understandable
> language
> > and check your facts before. If it means more keystrokes for you, too
bad
> for
> > you. But we won't accept being the victims of your >laziness.
>
>
> I don't understand...I don't see what the problem is. I can understand
90%
> of his mails...I'm having problems understanding you guys.
>
By that, I mean I have problems understanding the reasoning of your
criticism of him.