In a message dated 10/19/2003 2:58:29 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
ray.brown@FREEUK.COM writes:
>Yep - as very natlangs function very nicely without articles, there
>must be a large number of conlang without them also.
>. . .
>I'm fairly certain Volapük didn't have them. Certainly BrSc (whatever
>form it eventually takes and name it is given) will not have them.
According to Alan Libert in his book _Mixed Artificial Languages_, Volapuk
had both a definite article ("et") and an indefinite article ("un").
Doug