Re: No pronoun, no article

--- Christian Thalmann <cinga@...> wrote:
> --- In conlang@yahoogroups.com, Adam Walker
> <carrajena@Y...> wrote:
>
> > Interesting info.  I thought about deriving
> > Carrajena's pronouns from "ipse", but ended up
> > deriving them from  "illum", "illam", "illud" with
> > corruption from "eum", "eam" and "id" which gave
> > "jun", "jan" and "jid".
>
> You can still use "ipse" as an intensifier, as
> Jovian does...
> |is Rec ipfe| [i reC ipf] "the King himself", |nun
> ipfe| [nun
> ipf] "right now", |ad iwu ipfe| [ad i:vz ipf] "to
> the very
> bottom".
>
Except that C-a is from Vl unlike Jovia so "ipse" had
already gone to "isse" which would make "isi" which
already means "that".  Of course, I guess it could do
double duty.  I sorta like that bettre than "si" doing
TRIPLE duty as "if", "yes" and "self".

Adam

>
> -- Christian Thalmann

=====
Il prori ul pa&#38621;veju fi dji atexindu mutu madji
fached. -- Carrajena proverb