Re: Verb order in Montreiano
| From: | Andreas Johansson <and_yo@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Monday, April 2, 2001, 21:56 |
|---|
YHL wrote:>
>On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Frank George Valoczy wrote:
>
> > > Interesting. Do you give yourself a few "sample words" to start with
> > > (before doing core vocab) to work with morphology? I find it easier
>to
> > > "see" what's going on with even morphology *I've* invented when it's
> > > applied to an actual word, but that may be a peculiarity of my brain.
>:-)
> >
> > I'm the same way, so either it's normal, or we're related ;) But then
>I've
> > heard tell that Korean and Hungarian may be distantly related...
>
><interested look> I don't remember hearing that one, or maybe what with
>the various theories floating around, I'm just confused.
I've got a map that confidently tell me they're both Ural-Altaic ... but
they this for what it's worth, since the same map tells me Iraq is
IE-speaking ...
Ok, the later is a misprint, but some think that Japanese and Korean are
related to Altaic (I don't know whether this is a majority opinion), and
Altaic is sometimes grouped together with Uralic (that is Finno-Ugric and
Samoyedic) as Ural-Altaic.
Andreas
Andreas
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Reply