> --- Daniel skrzypszy:
>
>
>>And now for the address:
http://www.conlanglinks.tk
>
>
> Cool site! Yes, I think it can be very useful, because everything is
> categorized nicely and easily accessible for anyone interested.
>
>
>>Do you guys think this is a good idea? Is there already a site
>>out there like this that I've somehow missed?
>
>
> I don't know. Of course, there are inventories of links to individual
> conlangs(you have one too, haven't you?), but that's a different story.
>
>
>>Are the links good? Should I add or remove some? Should there
>>be more or less categories? In that case, which? (Comments on
>>the layout and design are appreciated too. I went for simplicity
>>and "overviewness" (yes, it's a word! ;) ).
>
>
> No, don't remove anything. Just add, add, add...
>
>
>>Links to possibly add:
>>
>>1. A link to a site with links to lots of conlangs, which is *updated
>>regularly*.
>
>
> I like such sites. Of course, Langmaker and Richard Kennaway's list have been
> mentioned. I like Dean Easton's inventory too:
>
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acropolis/9219/conlib.html
>
>
>>5. Things I haven't thought about yet.
>
>
> Undoubtedly, a lot of things will turn up by themselves. There are several
> sites dealing with IPA, ASCII/IPA, Unicode, Fontmaking programs, online
> dictionaries, grammars & courses of interestings natlangs...
> And I would certainly include links to all possible email lists, Yahoo! groups,
> etc. that are dealing with conlangs. If you like, I can collect the addresses
> for you.
>
> Keep up the good work!