Re: TERMS: going dotty, twice over (was: TERMS: Umlaut-Ablaut)
From: | Roland Hoensch <hoensch@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, November 16, 1999, 22:59 |
The reason englishspeakers still call it umlaut in Hungarian and Turksh i=
s
not because there is no name for them. It is because the name isn't as
easily anglicized. I like to call it an "if it isn't English, it doesn't
exist or we'll make it" approach.
Hungarians call it "kett=F5spont". Same as a colon. The word literally =
means
'doubled-dot'.
----- Original Message -----
From: Raymond Brown <ray.brown@...>
To: Multiple recipients of list CONLANG <CONLANG@...>
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 1999 10:35 AM
Subject: Re: TERMS: going dotty, twice over (was: TERMS: Umlaut-Ablaut)
At 12:54 pm -0800 15/11/99, Barry Garcia wrote:
>ray.brown@freeuk.com writes:
[...]
>Not sure, as "biling=FCe" is the only Spanish word I have learned so far=
to
>use diaresis. I just know that's how you spell it. The reason I thought =
it
>was called "umlaut" was my friend Ann told me that's what the diaresis w=
as
>called when I asked her "What are those two dots were for over the u in
>biling=FCe".
I guess by now you'll have seen that things are rather confused in Englis=
h
:)
Strictly speaking the two dots in Spanish mark di(a)eresis [we Brits keep
the 'a', the Americans omit it], and the dots are also called 'diaeresis'.
This was the original use of them and goes back to Hellenistic Greek
practice.
The French use them the same way, e.g. Mo=EFse (Moses), to show that it's
pronounced /moiz/ and not */mwaz/.
It has occasionally been used in English. In verse you may meet "thou
se=EBst" to show that the second word is pronounced /'siEst/ and not /si:=
st/.
The Bront=EB sisters put the diaeresis on the final -e of their surname t=
o
show that it was pronounced and not silent as final -e usually is in
English.
These are all examples of diaeresis.
The Germans used to (and occasionally still do) show the i-umlaut
modification of vowels by writing an 'e' after the vowel, e.g. Baer (B=E4=
r).
Then they got into the habit of writing the 'e' smaller & above the lette=
r.
This small, superscript 'e' then shrank away to leave two dots, hence the
modern German 'umlaut'. The two dots over the 'a' in B=E4r are not diaer=
esis
but show the umlaut modification of the vowel. The modified 'u' in T=FCr=
is,
of course, the high, rounded _front_ vowel [y] and not the =FC in Spanish
biling=FCe.
To complicate matters further, some orthographies (e.g. Hungarian &
Turkish) have then borrowed the German =F6, and =FC to rounded, front vow=
els
although they do not derive from any umlaut vowel gradation. So strictly
the dots do not show umlaut in these languages; but we have no separate
name for them & would generally refer to them as 'umlauts' here (What do
the Hungarians & Turks call them?).
BTW it's always correct to say "u with two dots" :)
Ray.
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
A mind which thinks at its own expense
will always interfere with language.
[J.G. Hamann 1760]
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D