En réponse à John Cowan :
>It's idiosyncratic as far as anyone knows. Another example, no longer
>reflected in the spelling, is "dwarf". (Hey, what do you want from
>a language that has like 8 different outcomes of final /ux/ = "ough"?)
Wow! So that's why "dwarf" in Dutch is "dwerg" (pronounced about /'dvErx/).
I was wondering a bit about that.
It seems to be an interesting site. I'll check it at home (I don't have
sound here at work :(( ).
Christophe Grandsire.
http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr
You need a straight mind to invent a twisted conlang.