Re: (In)transitive verbs
From: | Trebor Jung <treborjung@...> |
Date: | Friday, February 13, 2004, 1:26 |
Merhaba!
Padraic wrote:
"If there's a consistent pattern of formation, then I'd say they form a "regular" group.
I agree.
Tristan wrote:
"three-way distinction strong/weak/irregular with a few subdivisions in strong and
irregular over regular/irregular with the strong subdivisions in irregular,
bearing in mind that technically, most* irregular verbs are weak (ones like
think/thought, set/set, do/did (at least, I think it's weak.
Could someone please explain what these terms mean?
Padraic:
"It fits the data best. I think that the strong/weak
distinction works best, as it totally ignores what might be seen as currently irregular.
Hmm. Interesting idea.
Tristan:
"Also, ask your average (naïve)
I've only seen naive with a trema over the <i> once or twice. Which is correct? (Or
is it like 'mosquitos vs. mosquitoes'?)
"English speaker to classify a bunch of random verbs. All the ablauting verbs they'll
put with to think and to be in the irregular pile...
Padraic:
"Well, of course! That's what they're taught! - and they could as well be taught that
these verbs are "green" and those verbs are "blue" for the sense that makes!
That's what I was taught.
Yep :((( . That's what I'm being taught, too :((( .
"I wasn't taught the strong/weak distinction until I got into college and began
looking at Germanic grammars! The Germanic grammars immediately made sense.
"Likewise with verbs and all those crazy Latin tenses that English doesn't really have.
I looked at Sihler's description of the English verb and immediately said "That
makes SENSE!!" - and that was just a couple years ago.
This is why when I take over the world, I will ensure textbooks of language are
written properly, and special teachers are trained to teach linguistics to the
masses! Any volunteers? :))
What are English's tenses, moods, aspects etc.? (I read once that someone tho't
that 'plural' was a tense!!)
Tristan:
"And given the connotations of 'strong', I really think it's inappropriate to call
English irregular verbs formed by ablaut 'strong'."
Padraic:
"I don't disagree, regarding the terminology. Ablaut/dental might be better, and
is certainly more descriptive.
I totally agree!
--Trebor