Re: (In)transitive verbs
From: | Philippe Caquant <herodote92@...> |
Date: | Thursday, February 12, 2004, 19:44 |
Looks like nobody agrees about what is regular or
irregular in english verbs, ant the same about he
number of syllables in an english word.
This is quite satisfactory for a foreigner.
--- Andreas Johansson <andjo@...> wrote:
> Quoting Costentin Cornomorus <elemtilas@...>:
>
> > --- Andreas Johansson <andjo@...> wrote:
> >
> > > "Regular" and "irregular" merely indicates
> > > conformance and non-conformance,
> > > respectively, to some set of rules.
> >
> > A good reason NOT to use those terms in this
> > context! Sing-sang-sung is perfectly regular.
>
> Not according to the set of rules that says that
> English preterites and
> perfects are formed by adding -ed, period. That
> that's an IMNSHO poorly chosen
> set is beside the point.
>
> And if we chose a Germanesque approach to
> classifying English verbs, which I'd
> rather like to, is-was-been is still screamingly
> irregular.
>
>
Andreas
=====
Philippe Caquant
"Le langage est source de malentendus."
(Antoine de Saint-Exupery)
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
Replies