--- In conlang@yahoogroups.com, Rodlox <Rodlox@H...> wrote:
> jy (like "DJoser" in Ancient Egyptian)
Does anyone what Ancient Egyptian sounded like?
> but = dusu
> and = sudu
> as well (as) = susudu
> and then = sudusudu
> so, therefore = dususu
> because = susu
> however = dusudu
It seems that you're making conceptually related
words sound alike. That makes it quite tricky in
terms of redundancy -- it's very easy to mishear
or confuse these words. Is it a philosophical
language?
-- Christian Thalmann