| From: | Philip Newton <philip.newton@...> |
|---|---|
| Date: | Friday, September 15, 2006, 5:38 |
On 9/14/06, Henrik Theiling <theiling@...> wrote:> > Philip Newton writes: > > > > I'd pronounce it roughly [ka:.stn=] > > Exactly the same here (an aspirated [k_h] that is, I assume).Ah - yes, of course. Thanks clarifying my underspecified(?) transcription. Cheers, -- Philip Newton <philip.newton@...>