Re: Enochian, also ritual language, was: The search...perfect language
From: | Andrew Smith <hobbit@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, June 15, 1999, 1:53 |
On Sun, 13 Jun 1999, Steg Belsky wrote:
> And now, put together like a Frankenstein monster, how i sing it:
>
> [higgOle na uPros HaBiBi 6Olaj es sukas S@lojmExO
> tO?ir ErEts mikvojDExO nOGilO v@nism@xO B@xO]
>
Let's see if I get this right. In a Steghian sung accent:
Dagesh Forte _appears_ to be ungerminated when a consonant is unvoiced,
although there is not enough evidence to rule this as consistant.
Dagesh Lene is preserved. Vet and Fei are bilabial fricatives rather than
labio-dental fricatives. Tav becomes Saf after a vowel. Gimel, Dalet and
Kaf preserve their classical pronounciation. A distinction in
pronunciation is made between Het and Khaf. Both alef and ayn are
preserved in speech. Sadei has become a fricative. Waw becomes Vav and
is distinct from Vet.
It looks like to me that the pronunciation of long and short qametz has
not collapsed together if I read O and a correctly, except possibly in
monosyllables. Generally classical values for vowels are preserved except
Holem(?) becomes a diphthong in a open syllable. Schwa in the initial
syllable of a word is always pronounced.
Just what I suspected. You have the basis for a very interesting
phonology there, Steg.
- andrew.
Andrew Smith, Intheologus hobbit@earthlight.co.nz
Lo! thy dread empire, Chaos! is restored;
Light dies before thy uncreating word:
Thy hand, great Anarch! lets the curtain fall;
And Universal Darkness buries All.
- Alexander Pope, The Dunciad, Book IV.