Re: TECH: Unicode 5.1
| From: | Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Thursday, April 10, 2008, 19:35 |
|---|
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Rebecca Bettencourt
<beckiergb@...> wrote:
> I understand why Klingon was rejected. What I don't understand is why
> domino and mahjong tiles were accepted. That's what throws me off.
Precedent set by the chess and playing card symbols may be enough to
argue for inclusion. But like you said, I suspect recency has
something to do with it - dominos and mahjong tiles are suitably
venerable. :)
--
Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...>