Re: what makes a con-script a Con-Script?
| From: | B. Garcia <madyaas@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Thursday, September 30, 2004, 12:23 |
|---|
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:33:29 +0200, takatunu <takatunu@...> wrote:
> I have a Codex Seraphinianus home. It's insanely completely nonsensical as a
> whole and makes me kind of sick when I thumb it through. I have no doubt
> that the "texts" are nothing but maniac, compulsive, meaningless squiggles.
I've drawn "Botanical" texts of imaginary plants like the Voynich, and
a little like the Codex Seraphinus, but whenever i've added
"squiggles" they mean something. I think that's what makes the codex
intriguing, it looks like the entire thing should mean something, but
it doesn't (well i suppose like all art, that's subjective)
--
Listen Johnny;
You're like a mother to the girl you've fallen for,
And you're still falling,
And if they come tonight
You'll roll up tight and take whatever's coming to you next.
Slow Graffitti - Belle and Sebastian