Re: lingual point of articulation, only lingual
| From: | Jim Henry <jimhenry1973@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Tuesday, August 30, 2005, 18:07 |
|---|
On 8/30/05, Carsten Becker <naranoieati@...> wrote:
> On Tue, 30 August 2005, 04:36 MEST, Henrik Theiling wrote:
>
> > Hi!
>
> Hey!
>
> > Adam Walker <carrajena@YAHOO.COM <mailto:carrajena@...>> writes:
> >> --- Henrik Theiling <theiling@ABSINT.COM
> <mailto:theiling@...>> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Or maybe because it takes a long time to prepare the
> >> > tongue for that
> >> > sound? Let's call that phone [$]. Now pronounce
> >> > [$u$a$sta], please.
> >> > :-)))
I've managed to produce a few rounded-lingual clicks,
but I'm not sure how to represent them. Most of
the rounded-lingual phonemes others have suggested
on this thread seem too similar-sounding to the nearest
non-lingual equivalent to be worth the extra time
they take to produce, but the original lingual fricative
sounds good, as do some of the clicks.
--
Jim Henry
http://www.pobox.com/~jimhenry/esp.htm
...Mind the gmail Reply-to: field