En réponse à Jan van Steenbergen <ijzeren_jan@...>:
>
> Easy. Always when I am trying to figure something out,
> or to reconstruct something, my brother calls me
> "Sherlock" :)))
>
That's cheating! :))))
>
> My definition is not really a definition. It is rather
> the sum of everything that remains when you leave the
> rest out. So: fiction is all but non-fiction.
> I think this problem applied to most definitions.
>
Yes, except that you have then to define what non-fiction is. And
IMO "something dealing with the real world" is about as bad a definition as can
get :)) .
>
> Sure. You can also use the French language for fiction
> purposes, after all ;)
>
Currently, I kind of use it only for that :)) .
> So we agree!
>
Only if you show up at my birthday party!! ;)))))
Christophe.
http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr
Take your life as a movie: do not let anybody else play the leading role.