Re: CONLANG Digest - 7 Sep 2000 to 8 Sep 2000 (#2000-245)
From: | Nik Taylor <fortytwo@...> |
Date: | Sunday, September 10, 2000, 20:21 |
Muke Tever wrote:
> > etc. (in another words, the "universal" tendency of SVO languages - as
> > opposed to Mandarin and English - is to be right-branching, right/eh?)
>
> English isn't SVO?
> It doesn't fit all those "universals", of course, but...
That was the point, English *is* SVO, yet violates a number of the
universal tendencies.
> Is <Cuchulainn> /"ku.kl=.eIn/ or what?
It's something like /kuxulan/.
> Dictionaries can't help much either, 'cause I don't trust mine much after I
> see it tells me to pronounce <robot> as /"roU.b@t/ or /"ra.b@t/...
How old was the dictionary? Cause I have heard /@/ used once or twice
in that word. I wonder if it's an earlier pronunciation?
--
"Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and
I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein
ICQ: 18656696
AIM Screen-Name: NikTailor