Re: DECAL: Examples #1: Phonetic inventory examples & motivations
From: | Geoff Horswood <geoffhorswood@...> |
Date: | Friday, January 14, 2005, 1:16 |
Sai Emrys <saizai@...> escrivut:
>First off: phonetic / phonemic inventory.
>
>Q1: What is your *phonemic* inventory? I.e., what are all of the
>discriminated phonemes in your conlang(s). (IPA / CXS / X-SAMPA)
>
Xinkutlan has (CXS):
stops p b t d k g q
fricatives s z S K h
affricates* ts dz tS tK
nasals m n
trills/approx. l r
vowels a e i o u
diphthongs* aj ej oj uj wa we wi wo
Xinkutlan treats the affricates and diphthongs as single phonemes, each
with their own symbol in their alphabet (which is phonemic).
>Q2: What are the allophones? I.e., for each phoneme, what are the
>"normal" variants that don't change meaning?
i <--> I
o <--> O
tK <--> tl
I think that's all
>Q2b: If you have any, what are the connotations / implications of the
>different allophones? E.g., do you use them for different dialects,
>registers, "accents", etc.?
They vary with whether the syllable is open or closed, apart from the last,
which I think is a dialect difference. Fairly conventional, I expect.
>Q3: How do your choices for the above reflect the goals of your
>language? E.g., if it's an auxlang [here!?], it's probably motivated
>by having common, strongly "universal" common-use phonetics to
>maximize learnability. So, for whatever your goals are for the
>conlang, how do they apply to the choices you made for phonetics /
>phonology?
Pure whim. I wanted something with a couple of odd sounds, but that I
could pronounce without trouble.
>Thanks,
> Sai
You're welcome,
Geoff