Re: Fruitful typos (was: Vulgar Latin)
| From: | Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Thursday, January 13, 2000, 11:30 |
|---|
At 10:39 12/01/00 -0500, you wrote:
>Raymond Brown wrote:
>
>> But what we have in Itakian [...]
>
>> [...] the two cases - Noinative [...]
>
>I know these are just slips of the finger, but they do look suggestive!
>Does anyone want to adopt the noinative case, or create a conlang
>called Itakian?
>
:)) What would the noinative case be? From "inate" (is that a good word)
and "no", I would say: the case of the negative origin :) (when you don't
come from...). "Itakian"? I may take it for my new language. Or at least it
would be the name of the language in English. Isn't there already a natlang
(maybe dead) or a conlang called Itakian? It strangely resonated familiar
to me...
Christophe Grandsire
|Sela Jemufan Atlinan C.G.
"Reality is just another point of view."
homepage : http://rainbow.conlang.org