Re: Lingwa de Planeta (LdP) introductory course
From: | Benct Philip Jonsson <conlang@...> |
Date: | Sunday, August 5, 2007, 13:00 |
On 5.8.2007 lingwadeplaneta wrote:
> Aha, so we can speak Russian! Nice.
Nemnogo.
> You know, I myself have noticed this z' component only
> recently. It is quite difficult for me to pronounce a
> palatalized d without it; this may be done, but then it
> sounds very unnatural.
I notice it all the time in native Russians, but they don't
seem to notice it themselves!
> I am not a phonetician (we have one in our team, though),
> but it seems to me that this happens because of the tounge
> position when you pronounce d' - it is very close to the
> one when you pronounce z'.
There is a general tendency for palatalization to develop
into friction. That's why you get the sound change series
: > tS_j > tS > S
: k_j > c > ts\ > s\ > S
: > ts_j > ts > s
: > T
As you may know all three of these have occurred in Slavic
languages at different times and places. In the history of
French and Portuguese, and Tibetan!, [p_j] and [b_j] even
developed into [tS] and [dZ], and [m_j] into [ndZ].
Perhaps the palatalization causes a delayed release of the
stop closure. Else all stops, not only palatalized ones,
would become affricates.
/BP 8^)>
--
Benct Philip Jonsson -- melroch atte melroch dotte se
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Maybe" is a strange word. When mum or dad says it
it means "yes", but when my big brothers say it it
means "no"!
(Philip Jonsson jr, age 7)