Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction
From: | Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, May 15, 2002, 12:44 |
En réponse à Tristan McLeay <kesuari@...>:
> You might have a job in which you're required to not bill people more
> than required. It might also be your principle to not bill people more
> than required. You are acting in accordance with your principles, but
> because of your job. You aren't going out of your way to make sure you
> principles are satisfied. You're going out of your way to make sure
> you
> don't lose your job.
>
Well, sorry but I still don't understand the difference. You are giving an
example of what it is to act according to a principle, just like John Cowan
did. But my problem is not there but in the "acting *because" of a principle".
Could you give me an example where acting because of a principle is not defined
only as compared to acting according to a principle? Maybe it would help me
grab a nuance that I currently fail to see.
Christophe.
http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr
Take your life as a movie: do not let anybody else play the leading role.