Re: Really Intersistemal (was: INTERSYSTEMAL CONLANG)
From: | Jan van Steenbergen <ijzeren_jan@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, July 2, 2002, 13:21 |
--- Wesley Parish wrote:
> Simple solution - base the very next IAL on Sumerian with heavy Chinese
> (tonal), Basque, Tamil and Ancient Egyptian conjugation and declination
> influences. But skew the pronunciation towards Shona, for very obvious
> reasons - no one else has done so yet, so it's free, and add in a large
> number of (Anatolian) Hattic, Urartian and Elamitic roots.
Then I will probably throw in some of my own Hattic as well! :)
> Then don't forget to derive the physiological and anatomical vocab from
> Mishnaic Hebrew and Islamic Arabic theological terms, simplifying what is
> complicated, and complicating what is simple ...
Seriously, if (if, if) I had been an auxlanger, I would not think it a bad idea
to create an IAL based on reconstructed proto-languages. Maybe I'll give it a
try once... could be fun!
Oops, have I crossed the line already?
Jan
=====
"Originality is the art of concealing your source." - Franklin P. Jones
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com
Replies