Re: Constructed Numerology
From: | Carlos Thompson <chlewey@...> |
Date: | Friday, November 6, 1998, 3:54 |
Laurie Gerholz wrote:
> Simon Kissane wrote:
>
> > <snip>
> > 3. Repeat steps 1-3 using the answer to 2, until the resulting
> > number is a prime or the number 4.
> > e.g. 45=3D3*3*5
> > 3+3+5=3D11
> > therefore, the final answer is 11
> > <snip>
>
> What was special about the number 4 in your system?
It just happen that 4 =3D 2*2 and 2+2 =3D 4. Prime numbers and number 4 =
cannot be
furtherly operated this way.
--
o_o
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3Dw=3D=3D=3Dw=3D=3D=3D=3D#######
Chlewey Thompin ## ####
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/9028/ ## ## ##
------------------------------------------------##-## ##
###
- =BFPor qu=E9 no?
- No tiene sentido.
- =BFQu=E9 sentido? El sentido no existe.
- El sentido inverso. O el sentido norte. El sentido com=FAn, tal ve=
z. O sin
sentido, como aqu=ED.
(-- Graeville 2)