Re: Gwr script
From: | H. S. Teoh <hsteoh@...> |
Date: | Monday, July 8, 2002, 14:21 |
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 04:04:02PM +0200, Christophe Grandsire wrote:
> En réponse à Roger Mills <romilly@...>:
>
> > And so back to conlanging. I've just put up a very preliminary version
> > of
> > Gwr script--
http://cinduworld.tripod.com/gwr_script.htm (thats
> > "gwr_script"). Comments/critiques/bashing etc. more than welcome,
[snip]
> bugs ;))) . The tone notation is interesting, if maybe a little *too*
> straghtforward. On the other hand, if it's a recent feature the Gwr adopted in
> their script (maybe until recently they didn't bother noting tone, just like in
> Itakian tone is not marked in the native script), I'd expect it to be
> straightforward.
[snip]
I thought the arrow-like shapes for the tone marks looked a bit *too*
contrived. I'd settle for plain curves and lines and other, less
pronounced strokes.
(But of course, I'm biased, since I use curvy diacritics for vowels in
Ebisedian's Sanoki script. :-P)
T
--
Why is the sea always restless? Its bed is too rocky to sleep on.