Re: The beautifulest phonology

From: "jesse stephen bangs" <jaspax@...>
> > > t_j d_j n_j F T D S Z h x K K\ l L w j
>
> Gosh, no unpalatalized stops!  What an odd bunch.
>
> I noticed that a great many of you are including [S] and/or [Z].  Fooey.
> I haven't never included those in a "beautiful" phonology and never will.
Yes... Alarmingly I don't find palatals (well, [S] and [Z] aren't technically
palatals but close) anything like beautiful.   [j] *may* be an exception, used
sparingly...

    *Muke!