Re: Introduction; need advice
From: | Sally Caves <scaves@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, December 18, 2002, 4:19 |
In the "lunatic survey" that I took three and a half years ago, "reasons for
making a language" were also discussed; are you talking about Heather Rice's
survey, Joe? I found that survey to be mostly linguistic. I'd like to
conduct a new Lunatic Survey when I'm done with this semester.
Sally Caves
scaves@frontiernet.net
Eskkoat ol ai sendran, rohsan nuehra celyil takrem bomai nakuo.
"My shadow follows me, putting strange, new roses into the world."
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joseph Fatula" <fatula3@...>
>
> In a recent survey of conlangs, reasons for making a language were
> discussed. I think taunting would be a new item on the list.
I agree. Taunting, obscenities, swearing, condemning. I'd be eager to know
for how many of you your language served as a means to curse in private. :)
> I'm working on
> translating Beowulf into one of my languages. Maybe the Havamal?
Beowulf, eh? Good job, Joe.
> > How much
> > does one have to do before the conlang is considered
> > complete?
> This is an easy question. It is complete when you have a community of
> people speaking it, teaching it to their kids, and then eventually having
it
> pass out of use and become extinct. You see, only dead languages are
> "complete". All living languages are still works in progress.
Agree completely. Quentin, I've been working on Teonaht off and on for over
thirty years, and it will never be satisfactorily complete.
Replies