Re: Patient marking in active languages
From: | Tim May <butsuri@...> |
Date: | Saturday, February 18, 2006, 20:35 |
Nokta Kanto wrote at 2006-02-17 23:14:23 (-0500)
> I came to a puzzling question when considering case markings in active
> languages. From what I've read about active languages, they assign the
> 'agent' case to the argument that performs the action, and the 'patient'
> case to the argument that gets the effects of the action.
>
> What does an active language do for verbs that (arguably) take two
> patients: own, be inside, overlook, ride, wear? Do they assign the
> "agent" role to one of the arguments, or use some other noun case,
> or not express such relationships as a verb clause?
>
As I understand the term "active language", it's a matter of how the
arguments of _intransitive_ verbs are treated. As far as I can see,
the treatment of transitive verbs that don't map well onto the
agent/patient pattern is going to be much the same as in accusative or
ergative languages.