Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessive
From: | Thomas R. Wier <trwier@...> |
Date: | Monday, January 26, 2004, 6:14 |
From: Joe <joe@...>
> Costentin Cornomorus wrote:
> >Why does tha think English has half ass patches
> >like "y'all" to begin with?
>
> I suppose part of it is a natural result of hijacking number
> distinctions for politeness distinctions. Sometimes. After people
> started to get all polite to everyone, the singular just vanished, I
> suppose. To be etymologically correct, perhaps 'y'one' would make more
> sense. ;-)
In fact, in parts of West Virginia and Ohio, the second persons
plural pronoun is [j@nz] (< 'you ones'). I expect this will die
out along with "you guys" as "y'all" pushes out all competitors
within a century or two, at the latest. (Heck, "y'all" is already
all over the Midwest.)
=========================================================================
Thomas Wier "I find it useful to meet my subjects personally,
Dept. of Linguistics because our secret police don't get it right
University of Chicago half the time." -- octogenarian Sheikh Zayed of
1010 E. 59th Street Abu Dhabi, to a French reporter.
Chicago, IL 60637