Re: Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessive markers?
From: | Dirk Elzinga <dirk_elzinga@...> |
Date: | Monday, January 26, 2004, 17:01 |
On Monday, January 26, 2004, at 08:44 AM, jcowan@REUTERSHEALTH.COM
wrote:
> I also like this system (which is a natlang one, but I forget the
> relevant natlang), for people who like duals:
>
> singular dual plural
> 1p I I and another I and others
> 2p thou thou and another thou and others
> 1p+2p ------ I and thou I and thou and
> others
> neither another two others others
Shoshoni:
1p ne neweh nemmen
2p ennen meweh memmen
1p+2p ------ taweh tammen
3p suten suteweh suteen
Note the striking parallelisms: (e)weh 'dual', mmen 'plural'. The third
persons are actually demonstratives which are used as pronouns as
needed.
Dirk
--
Dirk Elzinga
Dirk_Elzinga@byu.edu
"Speech is human, silence is divine, yet also brutish and dead;
therefore we
must learn both arts." - Thomas
Carlyle