Re: Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness in possessive markers?

Quoting Joe <joe@...>:

> Trebor Jung wrote:
>
> > Merhaba!
> >
> > I guess sg/pl for 2p is unnecessary, so it's scrapped now.
> >
>
>
> Why would sg/pl be unneccesary?  Just because we don't use it in English.
?

If it's not used in English (or some yall-free variants thereof), it's either
not necessary, or English isn't a usable language. The later position does
seem somewhat hard to defend.

                                                        Andreas

Replies