From: | T. A. McLeay <relay@...> |
---|---|
Date: | Wednesday, January 31, 2007, 21:58 |
On 1/31/07, Benct Philip Jonsson <conlang@...> wrote:>in uterque sensuPardon? ...> (12) _U_ for /w/ is preferable to _o_ since we don't want > 'wolf' _uolf_, 'would'-'wood' _uodd_, 'woman' _uOmman_, > 'wound' _uOnd_ to become [ulf], [ud], ['uman], [und]. > We may get [wolf] etc., but that's IMO less grave.Personally, considering the vowel is actually /U/ or /u:/, I would've thought that the first group would've been less grave, particularly if they treat them as starting with a consonant (and hence say /@ und/ and not /@n und/ for 'a wound')... Altho I suppose it depends on how high the /o/ is and who they're meant to sound native to. -- Alexander
Benct Philip Jonsson <conlang@...> |