Re: A Retro-Phonology for Jases Lalal
From: | James Worlton <jworlton@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, March 10, 2004, 3:09 |
sandat John L. Leland:
> Jases Lalel Labal
> Phoneme transcription in Jases Lalal.
> Unlike many conlangers, I do not have a primary interest in phonology;
I find it hard to get away from, but perhaps that is my musician's
training influencing my conlanging (lots of ings there...). I
unfortunately don't know a lot about phonology, but I'm working on that.
(Anyone know of any good _specific_ resources? (other than natlangs
themselves obviously)
> I think of my languages as the remains of the written texts of
> ancient civilizations, not the living languages of current speakers
> (though I am not consistent on this, since my concultures have ongoing
> histories)
> In the example of Jases Lalal, I developed a written transcription
> of the language and used it for some time before asking
> myself how it was pronounced. I have now tried to work out a reasonably
> consistent way of pronouncing it, though I have to say
> that I do not follow it rigorously when reciting bits aloud to myself.
> In particular, I am not satisfied with the ew, iw and uw combinations.
> John Leland
Perhaps the 'w' could attach to the next consonant as a labialization in
those cases. Your vowel system does seem pretty symmetrical and regular,
why not merge some of them, like E -> e for example, but keep the
orthography. English certianly uses many orthographic representations
for its vowels. If I knew more, I could comment further, but as it is I
probably have already made insufficient sense. :)
> Transcription X-SAMPA
>
> Vowels
>
> a {
> ah A
> aw O
> e e
> eh E
> ew eu
> i i
> ih I
> iw iu
> o o
> oh @
> ow aU
> u u
> uh U
> uw uU
> y (as vowel) aj
> Consonants (in Jases Lawan alphabetical order)
> j d_Z
> m m
> n n
> t t
> b b
> k k
> d d
> f f
> g g
> h h (initially and medially)
> l l
> p p
> s s
> v v
> w w (initially and medially)
> x k_s (medially and finally; initially it tends to tS)
> y (as consonant)j
> z z
--
=============
James Worlton
"We know by means of our intelligence
that what the intelligence does not
comprehend is more real than what it
does comprehend."
--Simone Weil