Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang)

From:Paul Bennett <paul-bennett@...>
Date:Monday, November 17, 2003, 21:38
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 22:14:21 -0700, Muke Tever <hotblack@...> wrote:

> On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 22:49:13 -0500, Paul Bennett <paul-bennett@...> > wrote: >> OTOH, what's the most useful purely 8-bit encoding for me to post in? My >> main requirements are to post acuted and trema'd vowels, some kind of >> accented "s" (ideally s-acute, but any other diacritised "s" will do), >> and some kind of accented "n" (ideally n-acute, but eng would do). Also >> nice to have are "combining acute", "combining ogonek" and "combining >> dot below", >> but I suspect there's not an 8-bit encoding that handles any of those. > > ISO-Latin-2 has those, actually (sans Ï and ï for some reason) except for > the combining characters [it has the spacing ones, though, for acute and > ogonek].
Latin-2 seems (http://nl.ijs.si/gnusl/cee/charset.html) to be close to ideal for my new forthcoming language (still unnamed; provisionally WC8 or UF1, I suppose, if I'm going to reinstate my old language-provisionally- naming scheme), which has a wide variety of those glyphs. Here's the total glyph set used by that language in UTF-8: p b m f v t́ d́ ń ś ź t d n s z ṭ ḍ ṇ ṣ ẓ ḱ ǵ ŋ́ x́ q́ k g ŋ x q ḳ ġ ŋ̇ x̣ q̇ š ž č ř ŕ r kt ct l ł lh dlh w ẅ y ÿ h ħ a á â e é ê i í î o ó ô u ú û I might add the capability of nasalisation (shown via ogoneks) to the language, since it doubles the number of syllables. Also, in my notes, I'm using real IPA instad of X-Sampa, which is yet another crimp in the wossname. Yet again, I wish there was some way of switching encodings partway through a message (several times), as it would be simple to encode almost of these with a mix of Latin-1 and Latin-2. I could even downgrade eng to enya if pressed, and drop h-bar either completely or replace it with kh or ch. Paul

Replies

Paul Bennett <paul-bennett@...>TECH: RFC 1345 (was Re: TECH: Testing again, no new on-topic content (was Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang))
Isaac Penzev <isaacp@...>WC8 (was Re: TECH: Testing again etc.)