Re: Orthographic Inferiority Complex
From: | Kristian Jensen <kljensen@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, November 3, 1999, 17:14 |
Steg Belsky wrote:
-----<snip>-----
>should i just use the cyrillic transliteration instead? (it's better
>than the latin and hebrew ones)
Using cyrillic would be interesting. Not many conlangs use cyrillic.=20
I'm not saying that the other transcriptions are 'uglier' or less=20
interesting. Indeed the Rokbeigalmki (sp?) ziifer (sp?) script is quite=20
interesting by iteself. I'm just saying that cyrillic would be=20
interesting too. It would give it, seen from a western point of view, a=20
'semi-exotic' feel to it - if its possible to use that term. One would=20
then think, 'hmmm... probably an exotic minority language from the=20
former Soviet Union', even though Rokbeigalmki probably isn't a=20
minority Russian language if my memory serves me correctly.
-kristian- 8)