Re: LCC2 Relay

Hi!

David J. Peterson writes:
> Henrik wrote:
> <<
> Is there a reason to not play this on the normal relay list?  Just
> wondering.  I am a bit concerned about a possible inflation of lists.
> Or is it important to have a one-time list for this particular relay?
> (I admit I did not read the rules which might contain this
> information.)
>  >>
>
> I'll add this information, but to reply:
>
> (1) Yes, this is a one-time list for a one-time thing.
>
> (2) I didn't want to use the Valdyas list because:
>
> (a) It's not my list.
>
> (b) We've already got a relay going on at the same time utilizing
> that list.
>
> This will not be a new list; I'll delete it when we're done with
> this relay.
Ah, now I see.  It makes sense now. :-)

**Henrik