Re: So-called Alternative Lifestyles (was Unconventional pronoun systemsshow us yours!)

> LOL. I understood your point. I just wanted to point out that even if
> you *hadn't* had any homosexual relationship (and even if you had had
> one but didn't enjoy it), it still would be wrong to condemn gay
> people just as it is wrong for me to condemn people who have a
> different lifestyle from mine (and believe, I'm very much at a loss to
> understand what people find nice in straight relationships ;) ).
Arguments LOL. I'm joking... I know there are arguments in all
relationships, straight or gay. But it all seems very much the same to
me sex wise, except the amount of lubrication needed... gay sex and
straight sex I mean *shrugs* One partner has an... orifice, the other
has something to fill it. (Of course, that doesn't really apply to
lesbian sex... lesbians seem to unfairly have less options in sex than
the rest of us lol, in the number of different... um... sexual acts they
can actually do... or I can think of. Perhaps I'm missing something...
I've never been a lesbian so I wouldn't know) Although I have to say my
preference so far with men is to be passive rather than active...
whereas in an average straight relationship its a little more difficult
for the man to play the passive role, given the anatomy involved lol,
and the fact that most women I know expect the man to be the main
driving force in sex matters.

Reply