Re: Nundin 2000
From: | Barry Garcia <barry_garcia@...> |
Date: | Sunday, December 5, 1999, 1:17 |
>But my own advice is that you ignore the problem altogether, since most
>people won't even be reading the site until after sunrise. Heck, now I'm
>taking this too seriously -- I mean, what are the ramifications of the
>calendar not mapping exactly to Rokbeigalmki days? Nada, nil, zip. This
>is
>supposed to be fun! :-)
Exactly what I had a problem with. For the Saalangal the day starts at
sunrise, like the Rokbeigalmki days do. Anyway, my idea was just to ignore
all of that and just apporiximate the days. Like you said Jeffrey, no one
reading the site will notice, i bet.
>
>
>Also, some people seem to think the 366 day file was meant to apply to all
>years. It's not. It's just meant to apply to next year. Obviously,
>there
>are many different length calendar years on Earth, let alone conworlds and
>penal planets.
For my calendar, the leap year turned out to be this year (the year for
the Saalangal is divisible by 4). Also, their year doesn't start at the
same time of course, so days are probably off. The exact time isn't
important to the Saalangal, and in fact they don't count by 12 hours, they
count the working day by sunrise, midday,and sunset. They don't count
time for the nights either.
>
>
>
>-4. Please nominate the only auxlang that should be included in the
>calendar. The one with the least votes wins. In event of a tie, none
>will
>be used.
Interesting way to handle this Jeffrey.
Anyway i'm still working on my contribution...
____________________________
Today is: 3 Angi 4 Kalil 2 Angi